4.8 Article

The COVID-19 lockdowns: a window into the Earth System

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 1, Issue 9, Pages 470-481

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43017-020-0079-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Stanford University
  2. NIEHS R01
  3. Sean N. Parker Center at Stanford
  4. NSF [OCE-1948624]
  5. USDA-NIFA [2019-67023-29679]
  6. Hatch [1003642]
  7. Ubben Program for Climate and Carbon Science at the Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern
  8. European Research Council Synergy grant [SyG-2013-610028]
  9. ANR CLAND Convergence Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused substantial global impact. This Perspective provides insight into the environmental effects of the pandemic, documenting how it offers an opportunity to better understand the Earth System. Restrictions to reduce human interaction have helped to avoid greater suffering and death from the COVID-19 pandemic, but have also created socioeconomic hardship. This disruption is unprecedented in the modern era of global observing networks, pervasive sensing and large-scale tracking of human mobility and behaviour, creating a unique test bed for understanding the Earth System. In this Perspective, we hypothesize the immediate and long-term Earth System responses to COVID-19 along two multidisciplinary cascades: energy, emissions, climate and air quality; and poverty, globalization, food and biodiversity. While short-term impacts are dominated by direct effects arising from reduced human activity, longer-lasting impacts are likely to result from cascading effects of the economic recession on global poverty, green investment and human behaviour. These impacts offer the opportunity for novel insight, particularly with the careful deployment of targeted data collection, coordinated model experiments and solution-oriented randomized controlled trials, during and after the pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available