4.0 Article

Versatile lab-scale test rig for experimental analysis and heat transfer modelling of thermally activated building systems

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/est2.176

Keywords

1D finite difference method; laboratory-scale slabs; sensible thermal energy storage; thermally activated building systems; transient heat transfer

Categories

Funding

  1. Education Department of the Regional Government of Castile and Leon [VA272P18]
  2. European Regional Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermally activated building systems (TABS) constitute an energy efficient building conditioning solution through the combination of low-exergy space heating and cooling and thermal energy storage (TES) features. Their implementation is, however, complex, due to the number of factors involved in their design and operation. Mathematical models are useful to overcome this, but require validation, while experimental setups to study sensible TES can be bulky and difficult to handle. In this work, a homogeneous concrete slab and a multilayer concrete-sand-gravel slab are built and activated with constant heat flow. Both slabs are experimentally tested and their thermal behaviour is modelled through a 1D finite difference method (FDM). Results demonstrate that materials such as sand and gravel can be used to provide relevant experimental data for TABS heat transfer model validation through a versatile lab test rig. A 1D FDM proves to be a simple, accurate method to predict the thermal behaviour of the slabs during transient peaks in charging and discharging processes as well as during steady-state operation, given that most of the time absolute errors remain below the measurement uncertainty thresholds. Finally, this paper sets a basis to support future experimental work on sensible TES and provides data for further model validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available