3.9 Article

Initial Physician Experience with [18F]Flutemetamol Amyloid PET Imaging Following Availability for Routine Clinical Use in Japan

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 165-174

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/ADR-190150

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid imaging; dementia; diagnosis; [F-18]flutemetamol; mild cognitive impairment; PET; safety

Categories

Funding

  1. GE Healthcare (GEHC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Brain amyloid is a neuropathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). By visualizing brain amyloid, positron emission tomography (PET) may influence the diagnostic assessment and management of patients with cognitive impairment. Objective: As part of a Japanese post-approval study to measure the safety of [F-18]flutemetamol PET, the association of amyloid PET results with changes in diagnosis and diagnostic confidence was assessed. Methods: Fifty-seven subjects were imaged for amyloid PET using [F-18]flutemetamol at a single Japanese memory clinic. The cognitive diagnosis and referring physician's confidence in the diagnosis were recorded before and after availability of PET results. Imaging started approximately 90 minutes after [F-18]flutemetamol administration with approximately 185 MBq injected. PET images were acquired for 30 minutes. Results: Amyloid PET imaging led to change in diagnosis in 15/44 clinical subjects (34%). Mean diagnostic confidence increased by approximately 20%, from 73% pre-scan to 93% post-scan, and this rise was fairly consistent across the main patient subgroups (mild cognitive impairment, AD, and non-AD) irrespective of the pre-scan diagnosis and scan result. Conclusion: The study examined the utility of amyloid PET imaging in a Japanese clinical cohort and highlighted the use of an etiological diagnosis in the presence of the amyloid scan. [F-18]Flutemetamol PET led to a change in diagnosis in over 30% of cases and to an increase in diagnostic confidence by approximately 20% consistent with other reports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available