4.7 Article

SeqCor: correct the effect of guide RNA sequences in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 screening by machine learning algorithm

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 672-680

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2020.10.007

Keywords

SeqCor; CRISPR/Cas9-based screening; Machine learning

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0102800, 2017YFA0103700]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA16030402]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501067, 31670829, 31971063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9-based screening using various guide RNA (gRNA) libraries has been executed to identify functional components for a wide range of phenotypes with regard to numerous cell types and organisms. Using data from public CRISPR/Cas9-based screening experiments, we found that the sequences of gRNAs in the library influence CRISPR/ Cas9-based screening. As building a standard strategy for correcting results of all gRNA libraries is impractical, we developed SeqCor, an open-source programming bundle that enables researchers to address the result bias potentially triggered by the composition of gRNA sequences via the organization of gRNA in the library used in CRISPR/Cas9-based screening. Furthermore, SeqCor completely computerizes the extraction of sequence features that may influence single-guide RNA knockout efficiency using a machine learning approach. Taken together, we have developed a software program bundle that ought to be beneficial to the CRISPR/Cas9-based screening platform. Copyright (C) 2020, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Genetics Society of China. Published by Elsevier Limited and Science Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available