4.7 Article

Reduced naive CD8+ T-cell priming efficacy in elderly adults

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 14-21

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.12384

Keywords

aging; naive CD8(+) T-cells; priming

Funding

  1. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-JCJC-0114-01, ANR-14-CE14-00 30-01]
  2. Fondation Recherche Medicale [DEQ20120323690]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP0033-110737]
  4. AETAS Foundation (Geneva, Switzerland)
  5. Promedica Foundation (Chur, Switzerland)
  6. IRGHET
  7. INSERM-Transfert
  8. Wellcome Trust [100326/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-JCJC-0114] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aging is associated with impaired vaccine efficacy and increased susceptibility to infectious and malignant diseases. CD8(+) T-cells are key players in the immune response against pathogens and tumors. In aged mice, the dwindling naive CD8(+) T-cell compartment is thought to compromise the induction of de novo immune responses, but no experimental evidence is yet available in humans. Here, we used an original in vitro assay based on an accelerated dendritic cell coculture system in unfractioned peripheral blood mononuclear cells to examine CD8(+) T-cell priming efficacy in human volunteers. Using this approach, we report that old individuals consistently mount quantitatively and qualitatively impaired de novo CD8(+) T-cell responses specific for a model antigen. Reduced CD8(+) T-cell priming capacity in vitro was further associated with poor primary immune responsiveness in vivo. This immune deficit likely arises as a consequence of intrinsic cellular defects and a reduction in the size of the naive CD8(+) T-cell pool. Collectively, these findings provide new insights into the cellular immune insufficiencies that accompany human aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available