4.6 Article

The efficiency of combined coagulant and ballast to remove harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a tropical shallow system

Journal

HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 27-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.04.007

Keywords

Eutrophication control; Cyanobacteria mitigation; Microcystis; Cylindrospermopsis; Chitosan

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) through a Science without Borders grant [SWB/CNPq 400408/2014-7]
  2. CNPq Project [473141/2013-2]
  3. Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro [FAPERJ - 111.267/2014]
  4. Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [FAPESP 2014/50420-9, 2014/06556-3]
  5. CNPq
  6. CAPES (Brazil)/NUFFIC (The Netherlands) [045/12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We tested the hypothesis that a combination of coagulant and ballast could be efficient for removal of positively buoyant harmful cyanobacteria in shallow tropical waterbodies, and will not promote the release of cyanotoxins. This laboratory study examined the efficacy of coagulants [polyaluminium chloride (PAC) and chitosan (made of shrimp shells)] alone, and combined with ballast (lanthanum modified bentonite, red soil or gravel) to remove the natural populations of cyanobacteria collected from a shallow eutrophic urban reservoir with alternating blooms of Cylindrospermopsis and Microcystis. PAC combined with ballast was effective in settling blooms dominated by Microcystis or Cylindrospermopsis. Contrary to our expectation, chitosan combined with ballast was only effective in settling Cylindrospermopsis-dominated blooms at low pH, whereas at pH >= 8 no effective flocculation and settling could be evoked. Chitosan also had a detrimental effect on Cylindrospermopsis causing the release of saxitoxins. In contrast, no detrimental effect on Microcystis was observed and all coagulant-ballast treatments were effective in not only settling the Microcystis dominated bloom, but also lowering dissolved microcystin concentrations. Our data show that the best procedure for biomass reduction also depends on the dominant species. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available