4.6 Review

Genome complexity of harmful microalgae

Journal

HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 7-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.01.003

Keywords

Diatoms; Dinoflagellates; Genome size; Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS); Harmful algal blooms (HABs); Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

Funding

  1. EU ENPI CBC-MED M3-HABs (Risk Monitoring, Modelling and Mitigation of benthic Harmful Algal Blooms along Mediterranean coasts) Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the past decade, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have provided new insights into the diversity, dynamics, and metabolic pathways of natural microbial communities. But, these new techniques face challenges related to the genome size and level of genome complexity of the species under investigation. Moreover, the coverage depth and the short-read length achieved by NGS based approaches also represent a major challenge for assembly. These factors could limit the use of these high throughput sequencing methods for species lacking a reference genome and characterized by a high level of complexity. In the present work, the evolutionary history, mainly consisting of gene transfer events from bacteria and unicellular eukaryotes to microalgae, including harmful species, is discussed and reviewed as it relates to NGS application in microbial communities, with a particular focus on harmful algal bloom species and dinoflagellates. In the context of genetic population studies, genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an NGS based approach, could be used for the discovery and analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The NGS technologies are still relatively new and require further improvement. Specifically, there is a need to develop and standardize tools and approaches to handle large data sets, which have to be used for the majority of HAB species characterized by evolutionary highly dynamic genomes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available