3.9 Article

Building a better biofilm - Formation of in vivo-like biofilm structures by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a porcine model of cystic fibrosis lung infection

Journal

BIOFILM
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2020.100024

Keywords

3R's; Biofilm; Chronic infection; Cystic fibrosis; ex vivo model; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Manchester Strategic Fund
  2. MRC New Investigator Research Grant [MR/R001898/1]
  3. BBSRC Midlands Integrative Biosciences Training Partnership (MIBTP)
  4. BBSRC [1897887] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/R001898/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections in the cystic fibrosis (CF) lung are highly resistant to current antimicrobial treatments and are associated with increased mortality rates. The existing models for such infections are not able to reliably mimic the clinical biofilms observed. We aimed to further optimise an ex vivo pig lung (EVPL) model for P. aeruginosa CF lung infection that can be used to increase understanding of chronic CF biofilm infection. The EVPL model will facilitate discovery of novel infection prevention methods and treatments, and enhanced exploration of biofilm architecture. We investigated purine metabolism and biofilm formation in the model using transposon insertion mutants in P. aeruginosa PA14 for key genes: purD, gacA and pelA. Our results demonstrate that EVPL recapitulates a key aspect of in vivo P. aeruginosa infection metabolism, and that the pathogen forms a biofilm with a clinically realistic structure not seen in other in vitro studies. Two pathways known to be required for in vivo biofilm infection - the Gac regulatory pathway and production of the Pel exopolysaccharide - are essential to the formation of this mature, structured biofilm on EVPL tissue. We propose the high-throughput EVPL model as a validated biofilm platform to bridge the gap between in vitro work and CF lung infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available