3.9 Article

Minimum information guideline for spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods to assess biofilm formation in microplates

Journal

BIOFILM
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2019.100010

Keywords

Biofilm; Reproducibility; Guidelines; Microplate; Spectrophotometry; Fluorometry

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant as part of the Print-Aid consortium [722467]
  2. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy -LEPABE - FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UID/EQU/00511/2019]
  3. Project LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION - Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020) under PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000005]
  4. BBSRC [BB/R012415/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lack of reproducibility of published studies is one of the major issues facing the scientific community, and the field of biofilm microbiology has been no exception. One effective strategy against this multifaceted problem is the use of minimum information guidelines. This strategy provides a guide for authors and reviewers on the necessary information that a manuscript should include for the experiments in a study to be clearly interpreted and independently reproduced. As a result of several discussions between international groups working in the area of biofilms, we present a guideline for the spectrophotometric and fluorometric assessment of biofilm formation in microplates. This guideline has been divided into 5 main sections, each presenting a comprehensive set of recommendations. The intention of the minimum information guideline is to improve the quality of scientific communication that will augment interlaboratory reproducibility in biofilm microplate assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available