Journal
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 255, Issue 5, Pages 979-985Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3600-6
Keywords
DMEK; PK; Cornea; Graft failure; Keratoplasty
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is superior to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in terms of visual rehabilitation, intraoperative safety and risk of rejection. Therefore, it seems reasonable to perform DMEK in eyes with endothelial failure following PK. We herein report our first clinical results. Methods Nineteen eyes with endothelial graft failure following PK were treated with DMEK. The majority of these eyes (12) had limited visual potential. The major indication for DMEK was pain relief in patients with bullous keratopathy. Visual acuity (VA), central corneal thickness (CCT), rate of graft dislocations, graft survival, graft rejections and other complications were extracted from the medical records. Results Although comorbidities limiting VA were present in 12 of the 19 eyes, VA increased from 0.05 to 0.1 (median) in 16 eyes. CCT decreased substantially (range 63-363 mu m). Rebubbling was necessary in five eyes with incomplete graft adherence. There were two immunologic graft reactions and three graft failures. No major complications like endophthalmitis or expulsive bleeding occurred. Conclusions DMEK is feasible to treat endothelial graft failure following PK. This is even true for eyes with limited visual potential.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available