4.6 Article

Impact of tropical cyclones on flood risk in southeastern China: Spatial patterns, causes and implications

Journal

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 81-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.02.004

Keywords

Flood peaks; Tropical cyclone; Influencing factors; Generalized extreme value probability distribution; Coastal regions

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51425903]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1508085MD65]
  3. Fund for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [41621061]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [41401052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using flood peaks data from 62 hydrological stations covering a period of 1951-2014 and tropical cyclone (TC) tracks, floods due to TCs were differentiated and relations between occurrences of floods and TCs were investigated. Then, the impact of TCs on the flood magnitude and frequency was evaluated. Results indicated that there was more than one external influencing factor for flood occurrences, i.e. convective precipitation and TC-related heavy precipitation. In general, the landed TC events have a crucial influence on the occurrence of floods in eastern and western parts of Guangdong province. The mountainous topography limits the northward propagation of TC events and hence limits their impact on the occurrence of floods in the northern part. More than 60% of the largest 10 hazardous floods in the northern and eastern parts were attributed to TCs and hence they significantly modified the probability distributions of flood peaks, increasing the location and scale parameters of the generalized extreme value (GEV) probability distribution model. Therefore, development of measures for mitigation of coastal flooding would need to consider the occurrences of TCs. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available