3.8 Proceedings Paper

Direct Adaptive Equalization with CFO Pre-compensation for Single-Carrier Underwater Acoustic Communications

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/sam48682.2020.9104300

Keywords

CFO pre-compensation; direct adaptive equalizer (DAE); phase-locked loop (PLL)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871114]
  2. Fund of Acoustic Science and Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University
  3. Fund of Science & Technology on Sonar Lab
  4. Open Funds of State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [SKLA201805]
  5. High-Level Innovation and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program in Jiangsu
  6. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [2018-KTHY-001]
  7. Fund for returning students to study abroad in Nanjing [1104000385]
  8. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [1104007112]
  9. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242020k30044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For single-carrier underwater acoustic (UWA) communications, phase correction is critical to the symbol detection on the receiver side. Existing receiver schemes either run a phase-locked loop (PLL) in parallel with an equalizer or perform the phase correction at the output of an equalizer. Both parallel and serial phase correction methods suffer limitations in practical use though. In this work, we propose to introduce a carrier frequency offset (CFO) pre-compensation module for existing receivers, with the CFO estimated with an m-sequence. The so-obtained receiver scheme was tested by real data collected in an at-sea UWA communication trial. Experimental results verified the extra performance gain brought by the CFO pre-compensation. In particular, when the CFO is the main source of phase rotation, conventional CFO correction modules like the PLL can be dropped without performance degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available