4.4 Article

Calcium Carbonate and Phosphate Reference Materials for Monitoring Bulk and Microanalytical Determination of Sr Isotopes

Journal

GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 77-89

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12191

Keywords

strontium isotopes; laser ablation; multi-collector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometers; reference material; calcium carbonates; phosphates

Funding

  1. Max Planck Graduate Centre
  2. Programma Giovani Ricercatori Rita Levi Montalcini
  3. German Research Foundation [DFG SCHO 1274/9-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In situ laser ablation analyses rely on the microanalytical homogeneity of reference materials (RMs) and a similar matrix and mass fraction between unknown samples and RMs to obtain reliable results. Suitable carbonate and phosphate RMs for determination of Sr isotope ratios in such materials are limited. Thus, we determined Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios of several carbonate (JCt-1, JCp-1, MACS-1, MACS-3) and phosphate (MAPS-4, MAPS-5, NIST SRM 1400, NIST SRM 1486) international RMs using dissolved samples and two different multi-collector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometers (MC-ICP-MS). Our Sr isotope data are in agreement with published data and have an improved measurement precision for some RMs. For MACS-1, we present the first Sr-87/Sr-86 value. We tested the suitability of these materials for microanalytical analyses by LA-MC-ICP-MS, with two different laser ablation systems: a conventional nanosecond laser and a state-of-the-art femtosecond laser. We investigated the RMs micro-homogeneity and compared the data with our solution data. Both laser ablation systems yielded identical Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios within uncertainty to the solution data for RMs with low interferences of REEs. Therefore, these carbonate and phosphate RMs can be used to achieve accurate and precise results for insitu Sr isotope investigations by LA-MC-ICP-MS of similar materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available