Journal
GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 701-707Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12174
Keywords
Sn isotope fractionation; cassiterite; reduction of Sn method; distillation; volatilisation of Sn
Categories
Funding
- DREAM project of MOST China [2016YFC0600405]
- National Basic Research Program [41372085, 41672079]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Increased interest in the fractionation of Sn isotopes has led to the development of several techniques for preparing cassiterite (SnO2, the primary ore of Sn) for isotopic analysis. Two distinct methods have been applied in recent isotopic studies of cassiterite: (a) reduction to tin metal with potassium cyanide (KCN) at high temperature (800 degrees C), with subsequent dissolution in HCl, and (b) reduction to a Sn solution with hydriodic acid (HI) at low temperature (100 degrees C). This study compares the effectiveness and accuracy of these two methods and contributes additional methodological details. The KCN method consistently yielded more Sn (>70% in comparison with <5%), does not appear to fractionate Sn isotopes at high temperatures over a 2-hour period and produced consistent Sn isotope values at flux mass ratios of 4:1 (flux to mineral) with a minimum reduction time of 40min. By means of a distillation experiment, it was demonstrated that HI could volatilise Sn, explaining the consistently low yields by this method. Furthermore, the distillation generated Sn vapour, which is up to 0.38 parts per thousand per mass unit different from the starting material, the largest induced Sn fractionation reported to date. Accordingly, the HI method is not recommended for cassiterite preparation for Sn isotopic analysis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available