4.7 Article

A General Model for the Helical Structure of Geophysical Flows in Channel Bends

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 44, Issue 23, Pages 11932-11941

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL075721

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Oceanography Centre Southampton
  2. Graduate School of National Oceanography Centre Southampton
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M017540/1, NE/K011480/1, NE/L009358/1, NE/M007138/1, NE/N012798/1, NE/P009190/1]
  4. HEIF at the University of Hull
  5. NERC [NE/P009190/1, NE/K011480/2, NE/K013653/1, NE/M017540/1, NE/M007138/1, noc010011, 1798672, NE/N012798/1, NE/K011480/1, NE/M017540/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/P009190/1, NE/K013653/1, NE/K011480/2, NE/K011480/1, 1798672, NE/M017540/1, noc010011, NE/N012798/1, NE/M007138/1, NE/M017540/2] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Meandering channels formed by geophysical flows (e.g., rivers and seafloor turbidity currents) include the most extensive sediment transport systems on Earth. Previous measurements from rivers show how helical flow at meander bends plays a key role in sediment transport and deposition. Turbidity currents differ from rivers in both density and velocity profiles. These differences, and the lack of field measurements from turbidity currents, have led to multiple models for their helical flow around bends. Here we present the first measurements of helical flow in submarine turbidity currents. These 10 flows lasted for 1-10 days, were up to similar to 80 m thick, and displayed a consistent helical structure. This structure comprised two vertically stacked cells, with the bottom cell rotating in the opposite direction to helical flow in rivers. Furthermore, we propose a general model that predicts the range of helical flow structures observed in rivers, estuaries, and turbidity currents based on their density stratification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available