4.7 Article

Viscoelastic lower crust and mantle relaxation following the 14-16 April 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake sequence

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 44, Issue 17, Pages 8795-8803

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL074783

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake sequence, culminating in the M-w=7.0 16 April 2016 main shock, occurred within an active tectonic belt of central Kyushu. GPS data from GEONET reveal transient crustal motions from several millimeters per year up to similar to 3cm/yr during the first 8.5months following the sequence. The spatial pattern of horizontal postseismic motions is shaped by both shallow afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation of the lower crust and upper mantle. We construct a suite of 2-D regional viscoelastic structures in order to derive an optimal joint afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation model using forward modeling of the viscoelastic relaxation. We find that afterslip dominates the postseismic relaxation in the near field (within 30km of the main shock epicenter), while viscoelastic relaxation dominates at greater distance. The viscoelastic modeling strongly favors a very weak lower crust below a similar to 65km wide zone coinciding with the Beppu-Shimabara graben and the locus of central Kyushu volcanism. Inferred uppermost mantle viscosity is relatively low beneath southern Kyushu, consistent with independent inferences of a hydrated mantle wedge within the Nankai trough fore -arc. Plain Language Summary GPS measurements of motions of Earth's crust in the months following the April 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake sequence reveal the mechanisms of fault motions and flow in Earth's interior that continue long after the earthquakes. Additional movements of the causative faults continued for about half a year after the earthquakes, while flow of high-temperature rock in the crust underlying an active volcanic belt in Kyushu has produced motions of the crust even far from the earthquake rupture zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available