4.6 Article

Estimating subglacial structure using P-wave receiver functions

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 209, Issue 2, Pages 1064-1079

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx075

Keywords

Antarctica; Arctic region; Waveform inversion; Crustal imaging; Wave propagation

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [EAR-1053484]
  2. POLENET-NAET program [0632230, 0632239, 0652322, 0632335, 0632136, 0632209, 0632185]
  3. Seismological Facilities for the Advancement of Geoscience and EarthScope (SAGE) Proposal of the National Science Foundation [EAR-1261681]
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1246776] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reverberations of teleseismic compressional (P-) waves within a glacier or ice sheet may mask signals associated with crustal structure beneath the ice. We remove the signal associated with the ice from teleseismic P-waves using a wavefield downward continuation and decomposition technique that depends on known ice layer properties such as ice thickness, velocity, and attenuation. We test the method using data from nine stations in Antarctica and one station in Greenland. We deconvolve the downward-continued seismic wave vectors to create P-wave receiver functions that minimize the ice-layer reverberations in order to better measure signals from deeper structures. The subsurface P-wave receiver functions have similar sensitivities to crustal structure as those calculated from stations installed on bedrock. Synthetic experiments indicate subsurface P-wave receiver functions can constrain crustal structure more tightly than surface P-wave receiver functions when ice layer properties are known. We model the subsurface P-wave receiver functions using a Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion and constrain the product of crustal thickness and the column-average crustal-slowness beneath the stations. Our subglacial shear speed and thickness estimates are consistent with previous investigations at most stations. At station SUMG in south-central Greenland, our results suggest a thicker crust than from previous estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available