Loading effects beneath the Gotvand-e Olya Reservoir (south-west of Iran) deduced from ambient noise tomography

In order to define the precise shallow velocity structure beneath the second largest dam reservoir in Iran and to understand the loading effects on the underlying crust, the shear wave velocity of the shallow structure beneath the Gotvand-e Olya (hereinafter referred to as Gotvand) reservoir is determined through the inversion of group velocities obtained from seismic ambient noise tomography, using continuous data from 10 stations of a local network, installed to monitor the induced seismicity in the region surrounding the Gotvand and Masjed Soleyman dams for potential hazard. We obtained Rayleigh waves from cross-correlation of waveforms recorded 10 months before and the same duration after impoundment of the Gotvand reservoir and calculated the group velocity from dispersion analysis in the period range 2-8 s. The group velocity dispersion curves are used to produce 2-D group velocity tomographic maps. The resulting tomographic maps at short periods are well correlated with subsurface geological features and delineate distinct low-and high-velocity zones separated mainly by geological boundaries. The 3-D shear wave velocity structure provides detailed information about the crustal features underneath the reservoir. The results are consistent with the lithology of the region, and attest that ambient noise tomography (ANT) can be used for detailed studies of the velocity structure and lithology at shallow depths using continuous data from a dense local seismic network. An increase of shear wave velocity is observed at the deep parts (4-6 km) underneath the reservoir after impoundment of the dam, which could be caused by the changes in rocks properties after impoundment. However, at shallow depths (2-4 km), a decrease of Vs velocity is observed that can be associated to the penetration of water after the impoundment. Changes of material strength underneath the Gotvand reservoir, calculated using loading effects of the reservoir by considering the pore pressure are in good agreement with the observed shear wave velocity changes across the reservoir.