4.7 Article

Continental weathering coupled to Paleogene climate changes in North America

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 911-914

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G39245.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bureau of Economic Geology (BEG), Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas
  2. Quantitative Clastics Lab sponsors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continental weathering is an important feedback on climate change. However, uncertainty remains regarding the sedimentary response and scale of this feedback, due to the sporadic preservation of in situ geologic evidence for weathering. We examined the United States Gulf of Mexico coast continental margin for a downstream sedimentary response to Paleogene climate changes. The Gulf Coast is a receiving basin for fluvial systems draining a large area of the North American continental interior. We sampled cores that penetrate the nearly continuous similar to 1000-m-thick siliciclastic marginal marine Wilcox Group (Paleocene-Eocene) and Frio Formation (Oligocene). The Wilcox strata were deposited within the Rockdale delta system at the terminus of the paleo-Colorado River, an similar to 1 x 10(6) km(2) drainage. Mineralogical and geochemical alteration indices demonstrate that sediment within the paleo-Colorado catchment was generated under temperate-tropical weathering conditions during the late Paleocene, shifting to higher intensity (warmer) weathering conditions at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary, and reversing to lower intensity (cooler) conditions during the Oligocene. The indices track the global ocean delta O-18 curve across the Paleocene-Eocene transition and into the Oligocene, an indication that global climate and hinterland weathering in North America were coupled during the Paleogene, and that silicate weathering was an important feedback to climate change over a continental-scale, tectonically active catchment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available