Journal
GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN
Volume 129, Issue 9-10, Pages 1227-1240Publisher
GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/B31516.1
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Utah Geological Survey and the Department of Geology and Geophysics of the University of Utah
- National Science Foundation [EAR-1261681]
- U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The 1934 Ms 6.6 Hansel Valley, Utah, earthquake produced an 8-km-long by 3-km-wide zone of north-south-trending surface deformation in an extensional basin within the easternmost Basin and Range Province. Less than 0.5 m of purely vertical displacement was measured at the surface, although seismologic data suggest mostly strike-slip faulting at depth. Characterization of the origin and kinematics of faulting in the Hansel Valley earthquake is important to understand how complex fault ruptures accommodate regions of continental extension and transtension. Here, we address three questions: (1) How does the 1934 surface rupture compare with faults in the subsurface? (2) Are the 1934 fault scarps tectonic or secondary features? (3) Did the 1934 earthquake have components of both strike-slip and dip-slip motion? To address these questions, we acquired a 6.6-km-long, high-resolution seismic profile across Hansel Valley, including the 1934 ruptures. We observed numerous east-and west-dipping normal faults that dip 40 degrees-70 degrees and offset late Quaternary strata from within a few tens of meters of the surface down to a depth of similar to 1 km. Spatial correspondence between the 1934 surface ruptures and subsurface faults suggests that ruptures asso-ciated with the earthquake are of tectonic origin. Our data clearly show complex basin faulting that is most consistent with transtensional tectonics. Although the kinematics of the 1934 earthquake remain underconstrained, we interpret the disagreement between surface (normal) and sub-surface (strike-slip) kinematics as due to slip partitioning during fault propagation and to the effect of preexisting structural complexities. We infer that the 1934 earthquake occurred along an similar to 3-km wide, off-fault damage zone characterized by distributed deformation along small-displacement faults that may be alternatively activated during different earthquake episodes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available