4.4 Article

Analysis of the presence of sustainability in Higher Education Degrees of the Spanish university system

Journal

STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 300-317

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1630811

Keywords

Sustainability; competencies in sustainability; Sustainable Development Goals; Sustainability Competency Map; education for sustainable development; Higher Education Degrees

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [EDU2015-65574-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that sustainability is present in all 16 Education Degree programs analyzed, but not uniformly. There is a disparity in the number of subjects that develop sustainability, with an average of 22.63 subjects per Degree. Ethical principles related to sustainability are more common than sustainable use of resources.
This paper analyzes the extent to which sustainability is present in the curricula of the 16 Education Degree programs belonging to the EDINSOST project: 6 Early Childhood Education Degrees, 7 Primary Education Degrees, 2 Pedagogy Degrees and 1 Social Education Degree. The results obtained suggest that sustainability is present in all Degrees, but not uniformly so. A great disparity is observed in the number of subjects that develop sustainability, with an average of 22.63 subjects per Degree. The competency most present is the 'Application of ethical principles related to the values of sustainability in personal and professional behaviors,' while the least present is 'Sustainable use of resources and prevention of negative impacts on the natural and social environment.' Sustainability is not developed uniformly in the different universities either. Three universities (UAM, UCA and UIC) develop sustainability competencies at 100%, while others such as the USAL do so at only 50%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available