4.0 Article

Sequential bilingualism and language impairment: the Persian version of ALDeQ parental questionnaire

Journal

EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE
Volume 191, Issue 5, Pages 815-826

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2019.1647192

Keywords

Language impairment; sequential bilingualism; parent questionnaire; ALDeQ; sensitivity; specificity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study confirmed the discriminant validity of the Persian version of ALDeQ in Turkish-Persian bilingual children, showing medium to very large effect sizes in differences between language impairment (LI) and typical language development (TLD) groups. The ALDeQ total score was found to be a moderate to strong discriminator with high sensitivity and specificity, making it an appropriate tool for assessing language development in bilingual children.
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the discriminant validity of the Persian version of Alberta Language Development Questionnaire (ALDeQ) in Turkish-Persian bilingual children, aged 75 months with 19 months of exposure to Persian, on average. The study sample included the parents of 22 bilingual children with language impairment (LI) and 114 with typical language development (TLD). The T-test results showed significant between-group differences regarding ALDeQ total scores, and for each section score, with medium to very large effect sizes. The linear discriminant function analysis showed the ALDeQ total score was a moderate to strong discriminator between TLD and LI group. The sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire were 0.80 and 0.89, respectively. The Persian version of ALDeQ is an appropriate tool for assessing the language development of Turkish-Persian bilingual children and can be used in conjunction with other measures to identify children suspected of LI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available