3.9 Article

Spectral bearing capacity analysis of strip footings under pseudo-dynamic excitation

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17486025.2019.1670873

Keywords

Bearing capacity factor; pseudo-dynamic analysis; limit equilibrium method; amplification factor; frequency factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluates the spectral seismic bearing capacity of strip foundations using the limit equilibrium method and pseudo-dynamic approach. The results consider the contributions of cohesion, surcharge, and soil weight, and show the influence of various factors on the seismic bearing capacity factor. The methodology presented in this study demonstrates efficiency in accounting for seismic loading characteristics and shear strength parameters in determining the bearing capacity of shallow footings.
Spectral seismic bearing capacity of strip foundations is evaluated by the limit equilibrium method (LEM). In this study, the pseudo-dynamic approach is followed to take into account seismic accelerations. The formulation of spectral pseudo-dynamic bearing capacity of strip foundations is presented for the Coulomb failure mechanism. The results are reported in the form of joint bearing capacity considering the contributions of cohesion, surcharge, and soil weight, simultaneously. A parametric study is conducted to evaluate the influence of soil friction angle, interface wall friction angle, dimensionless ratio of cohesion, depth factor, primary and shear wavelength values, amplification factor as well as the frequency on the seismic bearing capacity factor. The results of this study are shown in the form of design aids and tabular for the sake of simplicity to be used by engineers. The consistency of the results with those reported in literature shows the ability and efficiency of the methodology presented herein. It is shown that both the seismic loading characteristics and shear strength parameters affect the bearing capacity of shallow footings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available