4.7 Article

Evaluation and improvement of the default soil hydraulic parameters for the Noah Land Surface Model

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages 247-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.09.022

Keywords

Noah land surface model; Soil hydraulic parameter; Pedotransfer function; Soil moisture

Categories

Funding

  1. Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) [582-5-64593-FY12-31, M1402636, M1401856]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil hydraulic parameters used in estimating soil water and energy fluxes are included in a lookup table in the Noah Land Surface Model (ISM). The purpose of the study was to examine the Noah default soil hydraulic parameters and compare them to soil measurements across Texas, USA. These default soil parameters were compared to measured soil properties from a soil database including 6749 soil samples located within and around Texas. Mean differences between measured and default soil parameters were tested using a t-test (alpha = 0.05). To assess the proposed changes to default soil parameters, water retention curves were created using updated parameters and compared to measured soil moisture content at field capacity (theta(fc)) and permanent wilting point (theta(wp)). Spatial trends across major land resource areas in Texas were also demonstrated for water retention parameters. Our findings indicate that 95% of the default soil parameters were significantly different from the region-specific measured values. Measured soil water content at air-dry, theta(wp), and theta(fc) are better replacements than default values. Consequent changes in theta(wp) and theta(fc) yielded a 35 to 76% decrease in plant available water compared to default Updated water retention curves showed improved agreement between estimated soil water and measured values in 95% of cases. For three texture classes, the standard deviations of parameters for water retention parameters ranged 30% for the slope of the water retention curve and 65% for saturated hydraulic conductivity. These results indicate the importance of accounting for spatial variability of soil parameters rather than combining these parameters into texture classes alone. The revised parameter table improves modeling of soil hydraulic properties. Ultimately spatially distributed databases of hydraulic soil parameters will better capture variability and spatial structure of soil processes modeled by Noah LSM. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available