4.1 Article

Networks of Opposition: A Structural Analysis of US Climate Change Countermovement Coalitions 1989-2015

Journal

SOCIOLOGICAL INQUIRY
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages 603-624

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/soin.12333

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Sociology Program [1558207]
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1558207] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article explores the structure of key political coalitions in the United States countering climate action, revealing their central role in opposing mandatory limits on carbon emissions. By analyzing 12 prominent CCCM coalitions from 1989 to 2015, it is shown that over 2,000 organizations were involved in these coalitions, with a core of 179 organizations belonging to multiple coalitions. The coal and electrical utility sectors were found to be the most numerous and influential in these countermovements.
The climate change countermovement (CCCM) in the United States has exerted an important influence on delaying efforts to address climate change. Analyses of this countermovement have primarily focused on the role of conservative think tanks. Expanding this research, this article initiates an examination of the structure of key political coalitions that worked to oppose climate action. In conjunction with their allied trade associations, these coalitions have served as a central coordination mechanism in efforts opposed to mandatory limits on carbon emissions. These coalitions pool resources from a large number of corporations and execute sophisticated political and cultural campaigns designed to oppose efforts to address climate change. Through an analysis of twelve prominent CCCM coalitions from 1989 to 2015, I show that over 2,000 organizations were members of these coalitions and that a core of 179 organizations belonged to multiple coalitions. Organizations from the coal and electrical utility sectors were the most numerous and influential organizations in these coalitions. The article concludes with suggestions for further research to expand understanding of complex social movements and countermovements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available