4.6 Article

Assessment of pile drivability using random forest regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17499518.2019.1674340

Keywords

Random forest regression; multivariate adaptive regression splines; pile drivability; cross-validation; Lasso regularisation

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2018jcyjAX0632]
  2. Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees [cx2017123]
  3. Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Disaster Prevention & Control for Banks and Structures in Three Gorges Reservoir Area [SXAPGC18YB03, SXAPGC18ZD01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilizes machine learning algorithms to construct predictive models for assessing pile drivability, comparing the performance of Random Forest Regression (RFR) and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) models. The results indicate that the RFR model outperforms MARS in terms of fitting and operational efficiency.
Driven pile is widely used as an effective and convenient structural component to transfer superstructure loads to deep stiffer soils. Nevertheless, during the design process of piles, due to the intrinsic complexity as well as various design variables, the internal stress state related to pile drivability remains unclear, which makes the analysis imprecise. Thus, the development of an accurate predictive model becomes emergent. This paper presents a practical approach to assess pile drivability in relation to the prediction of Maximum compressive stresses and Blow per foot using a series of machine learning algorithms. A database of more than 4000 piles is employed to construct random forest regression (RFR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models. The 10-fold cross-validation method and Lasso regularisation are adapted to obtain the model of superior generalisation ability and better persuasive results. Lastly, the results of RFR and MARS models were compared and evaluated in accordance with the goodness of fit, running time and interpretability. The results show that the RFR model performs better than the MARS in terms of fitting and operational efficiency, but is short of interpretability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available