Are we all Charlie? How media priming and framing affect immigration policy preferences after terrorist attacks

Terrorist attacks negatively affect support for immigration policy, and this has been linked to the extensive media coverage of terrorism. Yet, this coverage may also have a moderating effect. This article uses the timing of the fielding of the European Social Survey, which took place during the Charlie Hebdo and Hyper Cacher attacks, as a natural experiment. Because the media coverage of the attacks varied between France and other European countries, it is possible to study how differences in the media framing and priming of the attacks affected attitudes. The expected negative effect on immigration policy preferences is found outside France, but not within France. This study's findings lend support to a moderating effect of the media coverage of terrorist attacks, both as a framing effect that influenced the perceived relevance of the attacks to immigration attitudes and a priming effect that primed the public with tolerant French Republican values.

Automated summary

This study utilizes data from the European Social Survey to explore the negative impact of terrorist attacks on immigration policy preferences, with a focus on how media coverage can moderate this effect. The research finds that outside of France, there is a expected negative effect on preferences for immigration policy, while within France this effect is not as pronounced. The study suggests that media framing and priming of terrorist attacks can have a moderating effect on attitudes towards immigration policy.