4.1 Article

Math Gives Me a Tummy Ache! Mathematics Anxiety in Kindergarten

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 362-378

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2019.1680518

Keywords

Math anxiety; young children; measurement; motivation for math; math achievement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study constructed and validated a Math Anxiety Scale for kindergarten students, finding associations between math anxiety and math achievement, self-perception, interest in math, and need for support in math learning. Results showed that children with negative feelings towards math tests were more likely to exhibit math anxiety, especially in terms of worry and somatization.
We report on the construction and validation of the Young Children's Math Anxiety Scale (YCMAX), a developmentally appropriate measure of math anxiety intended for kindergarten students. We administered the YCMAX to a sample of public school kindergarteners (N = 355) and conducted factor analyses to examine its structure. A two-factor solution (Worry and Somatization) best fit the data. Children with higher, compared to lower, Worry and Somatization scores had lower math achievement, reported feeling less competent at math, liked math less, and were evaluated by their teachers as less interested in and needing more support for learning math. In addition, we documented children's experiences with math tests using three open-ended questions. More than half of the children (n = 216, 61%) commented on their math tests, including test procedures, test content, and test results. Children who felt negatively about math tests expressed more worry and, particularly, more somatization compared to those with positive feelings about math tests. The results indicated that the YCMAX scores were internally consistent and demonstrated construct validity, thus supporting the instrument's utility for research on math anxiety in the early grades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available