4.3 Review

Entrepreneurial Passion: A Review, Synthesis, and Agenda for Future Research

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apps.12236

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a comprehensive and critical review of empirical work on entrepreneurial passion, highlighting inconsistencies and limitations in existing research while proposing a research agenda for the second generation of entrepreneurial passion research. It also emphasizes how insights from the entrepreneurial passion literature can inform scholarship on passion more broadly.
The present study undertakes a comprehensive and critical review of the body of empirical work on entrepreneurial passion. In particular, we document how the first generation of research on entrepreneurial passion and work passion in entrepreneurs has gained growing attention in various sub-fields of entrepreneurship research including entrepreneurial management, psychology, and finance. We provide an overview over theories used, definitions and measurements adopted, research methods utilized (e.g., qualitative vs. quantitative, survey-based vs. experimental/intervention), the thematic focus of studies, and unit of investigation (e.g., individual vs. team). We not only flag the problems of inconsistencies and limitations with respect to theory use, the making of causal inferences, and the conceptualization and measurement of entrepreneurial passion in existing studies (e.g., jingle fallacies), but also review the antecedents and outcomes of entrepreneurial passion identified in prior work and work where it had been examined as a moderator. Following this, we offer a research agenda with concrete suggestions to act as a foundation for the second generation of entrepreneurial passion research that proactively addresses the issues and gaps identified in our review. Finally, we also highlight how insights from the entrepreneurial passion literature can inform scholarship on passion more broadly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available