4.2 Article

Understanding the relationship between traumatic suffering, posttraumatic growth, and prosocial variables

Journal

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 710-718

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1705841

Keywords

Affect; osttraumatic growth; psychopathology; prosocial; trauma reactions

Funding

  1. University of Manitoba
  2. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [410-2009-2189]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the severity of trauma can affect the level of PTG, and PTG is associated with trauma-related, psychopathology/affect, and prosocial factors. Moderately distressing trauma, positive affect, and prosocial behavior contribute to growth.
Objective: We investigated facets of posttraumatic growth (PTG) theory, including the nature of the index event, the relationship between suffering and PTG, and prosocial correlates of PTG. Methods: Undergraduate students (N = 253) completed measures of PTG and trauma-related, psychopathology/affect, and prosocial correlates. Results: Differences emerged in PTG according to event severity, with greater PTG for those who experienced a trauma compared to a stressor. PTG was associated with nearly all trauma-related, select psychopathology/affect (e.g., anxiety, positive affect) and prosocial (e.g., empathy, volunteerism) variables. In a multivariable model, race/ethnicity, helpfulness, perceived chronicity of distress, and positive affect were associated with PTG. Curvilinear trends demonstrated that moderate chronicity of distress and current emotional distress from trauma were associated with the greatest PTG. Conclusions: Findings highlight factors associated with growth, including a moderately distressing trauma, positive affect, and prosocial behavior. Results clarify PTG theory and contribute to understanding conflicting evidence in prior PTG literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available