3.8 Review

A critical review of the assessment of medical gloves

Journal

TRIBOLOGY-MATERIALS SURFACES & INTERFACES
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 10-19

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17515831.2020.1730619

Keywords

Medical gloves; Tactile sensitivity; Dexterity; Perception; Friction; Grip; Double gloving; Glove assessment

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the integrated Tribology Centre for Doctoral Training (iT-CDT)
  2. Synthomer (UK) Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medical protective gloves need to be assessed to adequate standards before commercial use, with concerns raised over the standardisation of testing. Studies have shown that glove design can reduce tactile sensitivity in medical staff, impacting patient care, and the loss of grip control and dexterity through glove use can be detrimental to medical tasks. More research is needed to understand how wearing medical gloves affects users and patients.
Medical protective gloves must be assessed to adequate standards before becoming available for commercial use. Strength, integrity and contamination are assessed at the manufacturing stage. However, concerns are raised over the standardisation of the testing; should more be done to assess how gloves affect the performance? Over the years, studies have demonstrated how the design of gloves has reduced tactile sensitivity in medical staff, ultimately leading to poor patient care through missed information. Studies have also demonstrated that a loss of grip control and dexterity through glove use are detrimental to medical tasks. However, it remains relatively unexplored as to how wearing medical gloves affects the users and the patients. Gaps in research have been identified around the frictional and grip properties of gloves. Linking the key performance parameters to the manufacturing processes, which affect material properties, will provide more insight into the behaviour of medical gloves and how to properly assess materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available