Re-interpreting re-municipalization: finding equilibrium

The remunicipalization literature posits that municipalities increasingly reject privatization in favor of in-house service delivery. A frequent interpretation is that remunicipalization therefore demonstrates a rejection of business-like service delivery in local public service delivery. We perform a systematic review of the literature on remunicipalization, to argue why this interpretation may be inaccurate. First, remunicipalization often involves corporatization, and these public corporations are very business-like. Second, cost savings are often at the root of remunicipalization rather than political ideology. We call for a more nuanced debate on remunicipalization in the literature.

Automated summary

The remunicipalization literature suggests that the rejection of privatization in favor of in-house service delivery does not necessarily mean a rejection of business-like service delivery. Often, remunicipalization involves corporatization and cost savings rather than solely political ideology. Therefore, a more nuanced debate on remunicipalization is called for in the literature.