Journal
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 268-288Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1720782
Keywords
European Union; free movement; immigration; ambivalence; reciprocity
Categories
Funding
- National Center of Competence in Research nccr -on the move - Swiss National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study reveals that many EU citizens hold conflicting views on free movement due to the tension between individual mobility rights and fear of immigration. Their support for international integration depends on the relative importance placed on inward and outward mobility.
The right of citizens to live and work in any member state is a foundational pillar of the European Union. The views of EU citizens on free movement are characterized by a puzzle: the border-free Europe is seen as the most important achievement of European integration but also appears as a main driver of Euroscepticism. In this article, I argue that this is because of a tension between citizens' own mobility rights and the mobility rights of citizens from other EU countries. This idea of ambivalence towards free movement is tested with observational data and a survey experiment across 28 EU countries. The results suggest that many citizens hold ambivalent views towards free movement due to a tension between the value of one's own mobility and the fear of immigration. Their effective support depends on the relative salience of inward and outward mobility. This finding has important implications for the public support of international integration more generally.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available