4.3 Article

The (self-)empowerment of the European Central Bank during the sovereign debt crisis

Journal

JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 83-98

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2020.1729145

Keywords

European Central Bank; principal-agent theory; self-empowerment; fiduciary relations; euro crisis

Funding

  1. H2020 European Research Council [312368]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [312368] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explains how and why the European Central Bank (ECB) became empowered during the euro area crisis, attributing this to the limited cohesiveness within the collective principal (Eurogroup), the fiduciary relationship characterized by broad discretion and independence on the ECB's side, and the ECB's strong specialization as an epistemic entrepreneur.
The European Central Bank (ECB) emerged from the sovereign debt crisis as one of the most powerful supranational institutions. Against this background, this article explains how and why the ECB became empowered during the euro area crisis. Building on the delegation, governor's dilemma, and epistemic community approaches, we argue that the ECB ability to play a strong role in this empowerment process and to convince member states to entrust it with more competences was the outcome of a combination of three factors: limited cohesiveness within the collective principal (Eurogroup); a fiduciary relationship characterized by broad discretion and independence on the trustee side (ECB); and strong specialization with the ECB acting as epistemic entrepreneur. We illustrate our argument with two cases: the Trichet letters exemplify an autonomous emergency empowerment and the introduction of the single supervisory mechanism demonstrates ECB influence on institutional design decisions in negotiating processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available