4.5 Article

Unravelling the antecedents of loneliness in the workplace

Journal

HUMAN RELATIONS
Volume 74, Issue 7, Pages 1060-1081

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0018726720906013

Keywords

Emotion in organisations; interpersonal relations; loneliness; person-organisation fit; well-being

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the different manifestations of loneliness and how it develops in the workplace, suggesting that loneliness indicates dissatisfaction in interpersonal relationships and can be heightened in a work environment. However, because loneliness is seen as a shameful topic, it is often not given enough attention in the workplace.
'I am lonely', 'I feel lonely', 'I am all alone', 'I feel lonely at work'. Each statement conjures up different sentiments about loneliness and speaks to the myriad ways one can arrive at the conclusion that they are lonely. This everyday language gives us insight into the mechanics of what loneliness is, what it is not, how it can manifest, and how being lonely is variously perceived in our social environments. Loneliness indicates that our relational life is unsatisfying in some way and implies a yearning for connection. The perception of loneliness is magnified in social contexts such as the workplace, yet because loneliness is often perceived as a shameful topic that is stigmatised, trivialised, or ignored, it is not something we often hear revealed within organisations. How does loneliness develop in the workplace? This article introduces a process model to help us understand how loneliness at work can manifest. Because the literature on workplace loneliness is far from mature, we use multidisciplinary research on various aspects of loneliness, relationships, and organisations to help develop a conceptual model of loneliness in the context of the workplace. Lastly, the article outlines future research directions for the study of workplace loneliness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available