4.6 Article

Material Sustainability Information and Stock Price Informativeness

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 171, Issue 3, Pages 513-544

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04451-2

Keywords

Voluntary disclosure; Disclosure standards; Sustainability information; Stock price informativeness

Funding

  1. Division of Faculty and Research Development of Harvard Business School
  2. Ford Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of materiality standards developed by SASB on companies' disclosure of sustainability information, finding that firms voluntarily disclosing more SASB-identified sustainability information exhibit greater price informativeness, while the disclosure of non-SASB information does not relate to informativeness.
As part of the Securities and Exchange Commission's revision of Regulation S-K, which lays out reporting requirements for publicly-listed companies, many investors proposed the mandatory disclosure of sustainability information in the form of environmental, social and governance data. However, progress is contingent on collecting evidence regarding which sustainability disclosures are financially material. To inform this issue, we examine materiality standards developed by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Firms voluntarily disclosing more SASB-identified sustainability information exhibit greater price informativeness, while the disclosure of non-SASB information does not relate to informativeness. The results are robust to a changes analysis and a difference-in-differences analysis that exploits the staggered release of SASB standards across different industries over time. We also document stronger results for firms with higher exposure to sustainability issues, poorer sustainability ratings, greater institutional and socially responsible investment fund ownership, and coverage from analysts with lower portfolio complexity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available