4.3 Article

Hot or Cool Processing? Adolescent Decision-Making and Delinquency

Journal

JUSTICE QUARTERLY
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 961-994

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2020.1730424

Keywords

decision-making; TRDM; adolescence; hot; cool processing; crime and delinquency

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P01-HD31921]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that adolescents' decision-making abilities are affected by hot triggers such as sleep problems, depression, and stressful environments, leading to a reduction in the preventive effect of reflective decision-making on delinquent behavior. Therefore, corresponding policy measures should be taken to address adverse social, emotional, and physical triggers and foster adolescents' thoughtful decision-making skills.
Adolescence is a vulnerable period of individual development when decision-making is easily compromised, and criminal involvement reaches its peak. We draw on and extend novel decision-making perspectives and use the first two waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (N = 13,399) to analyze whether factors representing adverse physical conditions, negative mental states, and stressful social circumstances condition the effect of thoughtfully reflective decision-making (TRDM) on adolescent delinquent behavior. We find that experiencing various hot triggers such as sleep problems, depression, and straining conditions significantly reduces the crime-preventive impact of TRDM (an example of cool processing) among adolescents. We outline potential avenues for further theoretical development of integrated frameworks of decision-making and crime and discuss policy implications aimed at ways to deal with the adverse social, emotional, and physical triggers and foster thoughtful decision-making skills among adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available