4.0 Article

Perceived impacts of tourism in the Arctic

Journal

JOURNAL OF TOURISM AND CULTURAL CHANGE
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 494-508

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14766825.2020.1735403

Keywords

Norway; personal interview; tourism impacts; tourism stakeholders; Arctic tourism

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ARC09092890]
  2. Ministry of Education Republic of China (Taiwan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the perceptions of tourism in the Arctic, focusing on the region of Finnmark. Results reveal six thematic views of the perceived impacts, showing that social factors could be more valuable than monetary contributions in this specific region in northern Norway. Discussions and suggestions for future research are also provided.
This research delineates the perceptions of tourism in the Arctic. It deploys a qualitative study to disentangle the complicity of perceived impacts amongst three types of tourism stakeholders: (1) residents, (2) tourists, and (3) tourism professionals working in hotels, tour operations, restaurants, tourist information centers, and tourism planning agencies within the study region. This study transpires in Finnmark, which is one of the most visited Arctic destinations. Sixty-eight personal interviews are conducted in six towns and cruise ships sailing through the study region. Consequently, the study presents six thematic views entailing (1) monetary contribution, (2) cultural proliferation, (3) community vitality, (4) personal enhancement, (5) environmental degradation, and (6) social disturbance surface as the perceived impacts of tourism among the stakeholders. Unlike most impact studies in the existing literature, this research shows that monetary contribution is not necessarily the key perceived benefit of tourism. Instead, social factors, such as achieving a vibrant community life, could also be a valuable contribution of tourism in the case of this region in northern Norway. Lastly, discussions from theoretical and practice perspectives are rendered along with suggestions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available