3.8 Article

The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction?

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 517-533

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10018-020-00271-w

Keywords

Emissions trading scheme; Electricity; Micro data; Office buildings; Climate change

Categories

Funding

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency [2-1707]
  2. Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management (RIEEM), Waseda University
  3. JST CREST [JPMJCR15K2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tokyo ETS is the first emissions trading scheme targeting GHG emissions from office buildings. While the Tokyo government claimed its success, research showed that half of the emission reduction was attributed to ETS, and the other half to electricity price increases triggered by the 2011 earthquake. The lack of publicly available permit price due to its design is another unique feature of Tokyo ETS.
Tokyo ETS is the first emissions trading scheme to control GHG emissions from office buildings. Although the Tokyo government claimed that Tokyo ETS had been successful, some argued that the emission reduction under Tokyo ETS was actually the result of electricity price increases triggered by the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011. Using a facility-level data set for Japanese office buildings, we conducted an econometric analysis to examine the impact of Tokyo ETS. We found that half of the emission reduction is a result of the ETS, while the rest of the reduction is due to the electricity price increase. Another unique feature of Tokyo ETS is that an accurate permit price is not publicly available due to its design. Using our estimated model, we found that the price is approximately $50 per ton of CO2 in the early phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available