4.3 Article

Agronomic responses of grapevine 'Chenin Blanc' as a function of training systems and rootstocks

Journal

SCIENTIA AGRICOLA
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

UNIV SAO PAOLO
DOI: 10.1590/1678-992X-2018-0413

Keywords

Vitis vinifera; tropical viticulture; yield; vigor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the influence of training system and rootstock on the yield, vigor, and physiology of 'Chenin Blanc' grapevine. The results indicated that the lyre training system favored increased yield and balanced vines, while the 'SO4' rootstock reduced yield and vigor.
The aim of this research was to study the influence of training system and rootstock on the yield, vigor and physiology of the 'Chenin Blanc' grapevine at Sao Francisco Valley, northeastern Brazil. An experiment was carried out on eight harvests, from 201 3 to 2017, in Petrolina, in the state of Pernambuco. Grapevines were grown under two training systems, lyre and espalier, and five rootstocks: 'IAC 572', 'IAC 313', 'IAC 766', Paulsen 1103' and 'SO4', using a split-plot randomized block design, with training systems assigned to the main plot and the rootstock assigned to the subplot. Lyre favored an increase in the number of bunches, branches and leaf mass in the harvest of the first semester of the year, while in the second semester there were increases of 40 % in the number of bunches and 10 % in leaf mass. Lyre promoted more balanced vines, showing a better ratio between production and pruning weight (Ravaz index). The rootstocks 'IAC 766', 'IAC 313' and 'IAC 572' increased yield and bunch mass under both training systems, while 'SO4' reduced yield and vigor. The stomatal conductance and instantaneous efficiency of water use were not influenced by either the training system or the rootstock. Under tropical conditions in the Sao Francisco Valley, 'Chenin Blanc' grapevine may be grown under the lyre training system, preferably on the 'IAC 766' rootstock, to obtain high yields and balanced grapevines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available