4.1 Article

Factors Associated with Help-Seeking and Self-Efficacy among a Sample of Deaf Adults

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-020-09739-9

Keywords

Deaf; Hard of hearing; Help-seeking; Self-efficacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined help-seeking behaviors and self-efficacy in relation to stressful life events, identity, and discrimination factors among deaf and hard of hearing individuals. Despite moderate self-efficacy scores, the sample exhibited low levels of help-seeking, with improved scores noted with stronger social networks. Stressful life events and parents' communication methods were significant predictors of help-seeking behavior.
Many individuals who experience psychological, interpersonal, and social distress do not seek help. Deaf and hard of hearing individuals who use American Sign Language (ASL) as their primary language face additional barriers, such as communication inaccessibility, stigma, and prejudice, which can further impede help-seeking. The purpose of this study is to examine help-seeking behaviors and self-efficacy in relation to stressful life events and identity and discrimination factors among a sample of 149 deaf and hard of hearing. Results indicated that there was a low level of help-seeking among the sample despite moderate scores on self-efficacy, high scores on positive identity and discrimination factors, and low scores on adverse life experiences. Self-efficacy scores improved with stronger social networks. The interaction between parents' communication method and social network mitigated stressful life events scores. Stressful life events and parents' communication methods were significant predictors of help-seeking behavior. Practitioners can incorporate these findings into their practice assessments and treatment as well as outreach efforts and program implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available