4.4 Article

Double skin facade assessment by fuzzy AHP and comparison with AHP

Journal

ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN MANAGEMENT
Volume 17, Issue 1-2, Pages 110-130

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2020.1735292

Keywords

Double-skin facade (DSF); fuzzy Analytic hierarchy process (FAHP); multi-storey DSF; corridor DSF; shaft-box DSF; box window DSF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to provide evaluation criteria for the selection of facade systems, using questionnaire surveys to assess alternative options for DSF and standard criteria. AHP and FAHP are used to measure the ambiguity of facade systems and evaluations.
A double-skin facade (DSF) has been widely used in recent years for its thermal and aesthetic properties. DSFs can also control wind pressure, manage natural ventilation and provide noise insulation. This study aims at providing an assessment of DSF to building designers and builders with their selection of facade systems. The decisions taken on the selection of facade systems are complicated ones based on multiple criteria. A decision must be taken only after many criteria are evaluated. While certain criteria such as heat insulation, noise insulation, and cost can be easily quantified, it is difficult to measure subjective criteria such as aesthetics. Therefore, the study aims at reflecting the experience of professionals who have applied such facade systems, to be able to evaluate all assessment criteria and facade systems. Architects or engineers working in the construction sector assessed criteria and DSF alternatives by replying to a questionnaire. Fuzzy set theory aids in measuring the ambiguity of concepts that are associated with human being's subjective judgment. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) has been applied to many assessment problems. It is used for the assessment of DSF in this study. AHP was used for the assessment of DSF in our previous study. The results of our previous study are also compared with the results of this study and findings are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available