4.3 Article

Adolescent Peer Victimization, Self-Concept, and Psychological Distress in Emerging Adulthood

Journal

YOUTH & SOCIETY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 273-295

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0044118X20910938

Keywords

aggressive behavior; bullying; mental health; peers; emerging adulthood; adult transition; longitudinal design; stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that adolescent self-concept partially mediates the relationship between adolescent peer victimization and psychological distress in emerging adulthood, with varying effects based on different subtypes of bully victimization. The consequences of adolescent peer victimization can persist and influence mental health in emerging adulthood, highlighting the importance of studying and addressing peer victimization in youth.
Prior studies have demonstrated that peer victimization is a common problem affecting youth and has short-term mental health consequences. There is less known about the long-term consequences of peer victimization during the transition to adulthood, or the processes whereby bully victimization may lead to poor mental health. This study utilized prospective longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (N = 1,413) to examine adolescent self-concept as a mediator in the relationship between adolescent peer victimization and psychological distress in emerging adulthood. Results indicated that adolescent self-concept partially mediates the relationship between adolescent peer victimization and emerging adult psychological distress. However, the relationship between peer victimization and psychological distress varies by bully victimization subtypes. Findings suggest the consequences of adolescent peer victimization can linger and impact mental health in emerging adulthood. Implications of these findings and suggestions for further research on peer victimization are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available