4.5 Article

High-Pressure Phase Transition of Iron: A Combined Magnetic Remanence and Mossbauer Study

Journal

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 4646-4654

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GC007143

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GI712/7-1, MC3/19-2, SPP1488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measured Mossbauer spectra and the acquisition of saturation isothermal remanent magnetization in alternating steps on the same sample of polycrystalline, multidiron metal powder in a diamond anvil cell across the body centered cubic (bcc) to hexagonal closed packed (hcp) phase transition at room temperature up to 19.2 GPa. Within the bcc stability field indicated by the presence of magnetic hyperfine splitting, saturation remanent magnetization and sextet area were well correlated during compression and decompression. The areas and dips of the outer (first and sixth) and middle (second and fifth) components of the sextet changed in relative proportion as a function of pressure, which was attributed to rotation of the magnetization direction perpendicular to the gamma-ray source. Sextet peaks disappeared above similar to 15 GPa, yet magnetic remanence persisted. Magnetic remanence intensity divided by the fractional area of the sextet, taken to represent bcc Fe, attained maxima at pressures near the boundaries of the hysteretic transition, which we attribute to strain-related magnetostriction effects associated with a distorted bcc-hcp phase. Magnetic remanence observed within the hcp stability field, as defined by the absence of sextet peaks, could be due to a previously described, distorted bcc-hcp phase whose hyperfine field was below detection limits of Mossbauer spectroscopy. Our study suggests that distorted bcc-hcp Fe holds magnetic remanence and leaves open the possibility that this phase carries magnetic remanence into the pressure range where only pure hcp Fe is considered stable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available