4.5 Article

Feminist filter bubbles: ambivalence, vigilance and labour

Journal

INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages 2307-2322

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1760916

Keywords

Digital feminism; safe spaces; digital publics; online debate; Facebook groups; affect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper complicates debates on the democratic limitations of filter bubbles by examining the case study of feminist filter bubbles, highlighting the practical ways in which filtering is adopted in response to information saturation and politicized vulnerability in digital environments. Despite the importance of feminist filter bubbles for survival in more open online spaces, maintaining the 'safety' of these spaces involves complex emotional and labor challenges. Further critical engagement is needed to connect filter bubbles to affective politics in everyday deliberation on social media platforms.
In this paper, we complicate and bring a new perspective to debates on the democratic limitations of filter bubbles, by exploring the case study of feminist filter bubbles. We extend understandings of the filter bubble to examine the highly reflexive, everyday ways in which filtering is adopted as a practical response to the information saturation and the politicised vulnerability engendered by digital environments. In doing so, we make a case for the necessity of filtering practices to create 'safe spaces' for feminist deliberation, at the same time as questioning whether absolute 'safety' is possible in feminist politics. Drawing on two separate studies of young feminist women who regularly engage with feminist private groups on Facebook, we document significant ambivalence regarding these closed spaces. While feminist filter bubbles were essential for surviving the risks of more open online environments, participants reported complicated feelings of guilt in not moving beyond these bubbles. Maintaining the 'safety' of these spaces also involved significant, ongoing labour in the requirement for participants to customise content within these bubbles, involving vigilant practices of moderation of content and the consistent application of trigger warnings. As such, we question whether the model of the feminist filter bubble is sustainable in the labour it requires already exhausted feminists to perform, and politically capacious enough to allow sustained difficult conversations. We suggest further critical engagement is required to connect filter bubbles to the everyday, affective politics of deliberation on social media platforms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available