4.2 Article

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for Spanish 5-to 17-Year-Olds

Journal

ASSESSMENT
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1445-1458

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1073191120918929

Keywords

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; SDQ; ordinal alpha; McDonald's omega; confirmatory factor analysis; measurement invariance; diagnostic accuracy; interrater agreement

Funding

  1. Fundacio Obra Social la Caixa
  2. Diputacio de Barcelona
  3. Diputacio de Lleida
  4. Department of Health of Generalitat de Catalunya

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of SDQ in assessing emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents, demonstrating acceptable reliability estimates for all SDQ subscales. Results indicated that SDQ scores were moderately to strongly correlated with equivalent CBCL/TRF/YSR scales and effective in discriminating individuals with and without clinical diagnoses.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been extensively used to measure common forms of psychopathology among children and adolescents. However, its psychometric properties vary across countries and several controversial issues warrant further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate whether the Spanish version of the SDQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing emotional and behavioral problems in a sample of 6,775 students aged 5 to 17 years, as rated by parents, teachers, and youth. We examined the internal consistency of the questionnaire, its factor structure, and measurement invariance across child's gender and age. Criterion validity was tested against the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Teacher's Report Form (TRF), and Youth Self-Report (YSR), and we measured the ability of the SDQ to identify children with specific psychiatric disorders. Finally, we provide, for the first time, Spanish normative data for children aged 5 to 10 and 11 to 17 years, according to gender and each informant. Our results revealed acceptable reliability estimates for all SDQ subscales. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original five-factor model and full measurement invariance was found. Furthermore, SDQ scores showed a moderate to strong correlation with those on the equivalent CBCL/TRF/YSR scales, and were effective in discriminating individuals with and without clinical diagnoses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available