Journal
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 71-90Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0263276420915268
Keywords
aesthetics; contemporary theology; Merleau-Ponty; phenomenology; post-secularity
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The article provides a critical analysis of Janicaud's position and proposes a reconstrual of the boundary of phenomenology. It demonstrates that Merleau-Ponty's work focuses on beauty and that the concept of beauty is inherently theological in nature.
In a landmark text, 'The Theological Turn of French Phenomenology', Dominique Janicaud posits a boundary that sharply divides the legitimate phenomenological tradition from a problematic variant seen to be fundamentally compromised by theology. This article develops an immanent critique of Janicaud's position. It demonstrates that his boundary relies on the mature work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty as a constitutive exemplar of the tradition, that this work is centrally concerned with beauty, and that its notion of beauty is irreducibly theological. Merleau-Ponty himself will thus be shown to enact his own version of the theological turn. I shall consequently propose a reconstrual of the boundary of phenomenology. My argument relies fundamentally on Merleau-Ponty's essay, 'Eye and Mind', and includes a critical restatement of Galen Johnson's reading of this text. In addition to its direct relevance to phenomenology, this article bears upon broader concerns, including the relationships between theory, the body, aesthetics, and the post-secular.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available