4.1 Article

Is content knowledge pre-requisite of pedagogical content knowledge? An empirical investigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 431-458

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-020-09466-0

Keywords

Content knowledge (CK); Elementary school; Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK); Teacher knowledge; Fractions; Teacher education; development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the relationship between teachers' content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) by aligning their measures, finding that CK can be considered a pre-requisite of PCK. The data was analyzed using two different methods, both supporting the idea that answering CK questions is a pre-requisite for answering their aligned PCK questions. The findings have important theoretical, methodological, and practical implications.
Given the scarcity of studies explicitly exploring the often tacit assumption that teachers' content knowledge (CK) is pre-requisite of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), in this study, we draw on Shulman's conceptualization of these notions to examine their relation by content-aligning the CK and PCK measures. Toward this end, we analyzed data from a paper-and-pencil survey gauging primary schoolteachers' CK and PCK on fractions. The data of 373 completed teacher surveys were analyzed using two different complementary approaches, with the one compensating for the limitations of the other: item response theory analysis and statistical implicative analysis. Both analyses suggested that CK could be considered pre-requisite of PCK: when the CK and PCK items were placed on the same item response theory scale in most of the CK-PCK pairs, the PCK items were more difficult than their aligned CK items; additionally, in most of the quasi-implication paths of the statistical implicative analysis, answering the CK items was found to be pre-requisite of answering their aligned PCK items. We discuss the study findings, considering their theoretical, methodological, and practical implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available