4.7 Article

GRIDSS: sensitive and specific genomic rearrangement detection using positional de Bruijn graph assembly

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 2050-2060

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.222109.117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program Grant [1054618]
  2. NHMRC [1116955]
  3. Lorenzo and Pamela Galli Melanoma Research Fellowship
  4. Australian Postgraduate Award
  5. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  6. Australian Government NHMRC Independent Research Institute Infrastructure Support
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1116955] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of genomic rearrangements with high sensitivity and specificity using massively parallel sequencing remains a major challenge, particularly in precision medicine and cancer research. Here, we describe a new method for detecting rearrangements, GRIDSS (Genome Rearrangement IDentification Software Suite). GRIDSS is a multithreaded structural variant (SV) caller that performs efficient genome-wide break-end assembly prior to variant calling using a novel positional de Bruijn graph-based assembler. By combining assembly, split read, and read pair evidence using a probabilistic scoring, GRIDSS achieves high sensitivity and specificity on simulated, cell line, and patient tumor data, recently winning SV subchallenge #5 of the ICGC-TCGA DREAM8.5 Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge. On human cell line data, GRIDSS halves the false discovery rate compared to other recent methods while matching or exceeding their sensitivity. GRIDSS identifies nontemplate sequence insertions, microhomologies, and large imperfect homologies, estimates a quality score for each breakpoint, stratifies calls into high or low confidence, and supports multisample analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available