4.3 Article

Aesthetics, verisimilitude and user engagement: reporting findings through fictional accounts in qualitative inquiry

Journal

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 650-666

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1468794120925769

Keywords

Fiction; user engagement; verisimilitude; research impact; ethics; qualitative evaluative criteria; affect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the use of fiction as a mode of representing data in social research, emphasizing the relationships between fictional research accounts and the ambitions of aesthetic engagement, verisimilitude, and user engagement. Researchers need to consider the importance of fictional reporting in creating more affective writing, while being aware of the methodological and ethical issues that may arise in the use of fictional accounts.
This article explores the use of fiction as a mode of representing data in social research. I show that three of the key drivers for fictionalising research accounts relate to the ambitions of aesthetic engagement, verisimilitude and user engagement. I look at the different ways that authors have attempted to achieve these ambitions and the methodological tensions that arise from them. I show that contemporary evaluative criteria in qualitative inquiry helps us to understand that fictional reporting is an important tool for researchers in creating more affective writing. However, there are divergences in how researchers conceive of and use fictional accounts, which highlight the importance of continued debate about the methodological practices of its use. In order to contribute to these debates I point to three areas that need particular consideration for researchers working in this area: (1) the structures of academic publishing and their embodiment in university audit regimes; (2) the absence of engagement with alternative forms of writing in academic professional development and training; and (3) the substantial ethical dilemmas in the use of fictional accounts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available